How to compare two Carbon Timestamps?

Stefan Izdrail

Founder & Senior Architect · 2026-06-29

Laravel Company
Title: Comparing Carbon Timestamps: Correcting Issues and Applying Best Practices for Laravel Developers Introduction Working with timestamps in PHP applications can be challenging, especially when comparing values from different variables or objects. In Laravel, you may encounter a situation where one timestamp is stored as a string while the other is an instance of Carbon (the built-in date and time library). To ensure consistency and provide accurate results, it's essential to address these issues by converting timestamps into the proper format for comparison. In this comprehensive blog post, we will discuss how to compare two Carbon timestamp variables and offer best practices for Laravel developers. What's Wrong with Different Timestamp Types? The issue you face arises from the difference in data types of your edited_at and created_at timestamps. Your edited_at variable is output as a string, while created_at appears as an object/Carbon instance. This discrepancy can cause problems when comparing these values later on. Both Carbon and native PHP timestamps represent the same concept (a specific moment in time), but they have different formats, making them difficult to compare directly without converting one of them first. Formatting Timestamps for Comparison To make your life easier and ensure accurate results, you should convert both timestamps into an easy-to-compare format. In this case, the recommended format is a UNIX timestamp expressed as an integer. Here's how you can achieve this: 1. For the created_at variable (Laravel's Carbon object): Since your created_at is already an instance of Carbon, you need to call the Unix timestamp method on it. The following code snippet will accomplish that: ```php $createdAtUnix = $created_at->format('U'); ``` 2. For the edited_at variable (string): As your edited_at is a string, you first need to convert it into a Carbon object before using the Unix timestamp method: ```php // Create a new Carbon instance from the string $editedAtCarbon = Carbon::parse($edited_at); $editedAtUnix = $editedAtCarbon->format('U'); ``` Note that you should always include error handling to ensure proper conversion and prevent unexpected errors. You can refer to the Laravel documentation for more details on how to deal with timestamps: https://laravel.com/docs/9.x/carbon. Best Practices for Timestamp Comparison in Laravel Now that we have both timestamps converted into Unix timestamps, we can proceed to compare them using the standard PHP operators or custom methods. Here are a few best practices to consider: 1. Use the appropriate comparison operator: Since you want to determine if edited_at is later than created_at, use the ">" operator (greater than) as opposed to "<" or other operators that may not reflect the correct logical relationship between your timestamps. 2. Ensure database columns are of the same data type: If possible, update your database schema to make both edited_at and created_at columns have the same data type, preferably 'timestamp' with default value '0000-00-00 00:00:00'. This consistency will improve data integrity and prevent issues caused by mixed column types. 3. Store timestamps as Unix timestamps (integers) if possible: If your application permits, consider storing the timestamps as integer values instead of formatting them as strings or date objects. Doing so will simplify comparison calculations and reduce potential issues related to different formats. Conclusion In conclusion, the best way to compare two Carbon timestamp variables in Laravel is by converting them into an appropriate format. You can first convert your created_at Carbon object into a Unix integer before moving on to comparing with the edited_at variable. To avoid future issues, ensure that both columns in your database have the same data type and store timestamps as integers if possible. These practices will guarantee accurate results for your applications and enhance their overall efficiency and reliability.